Timoni West is a web designer in San Francisco.
This is her blog.

Examine her portfolio here, find some new music, or follow her on Twitter, Flickr, or other places around the internet.

Posts about coffee
December 1st, 2009

The question: I am in the situation where a friend of mine…is bringing me coffee. I want to make this as humorously difficult as possible. What are some obnoxious qualifiers that I can put on my coffee request?

The answer, from dirtdirt: I say you order an iced grande breve half caf misto red-eye, with a pump of mocha, pump of vanilla, a scoop of vanilla powder, and a Sugar-in-the-raw, with whip cream and caramel, in a vente cup. Iced means the barista has to deal with ice, breve means they have to grab half & half (often it’s in the fridge, sometimes you’ll get lucky and it’s in the back, rarely is it handy) misto is Starbese for cafe au lait - drip coffee with steamed milk, but it’s iced so you are getting milk with iced coffee. So they can’t just push the half/caf button, in fact they have to go to a different station (hopefully) to get the iced coffee, from TWO pitchers, caf and decaf. The sugar in the raw, mocha and vanilla syrup are to slow things down, the vanilla powder is a pain in the ass and in a different place. Red eye means they have to go back and throw an espresso shot on top. You are getting a grande in a vente cup because baristas have sense memories (and markings on the sides of the cups) to keep ratios straight and it just throws another slight monkeywrench at them, whip cream and caramel because, again, it takes time and is annoying.

Creative Coffee Request, via Metafilter

August 10th, 2009
There are a couple of coffee shops in San Francisco, for example—and I won’t name them only because I don’t want to encourage crowds—where there is silence because everyone is engrossed in their laptops. You can walk into these places and 30 or 40 pairs of eyes are illuminated by screen lighting. There is no conversation, not even recognition of other human life forms. Perhaps the most bizarre sight is a table for four, with four dedicated souls ignoring each other and having eyes only for their homework, gossip sites, or IM.

Should Starbucks ban laptops?, in CNET

There’s a general assumption in articles like these that it would be better—not just financially beneficial to coffee shops, but flat-out better, say, for humanity—if folks socialized more, and typed less, in coffee shops. This assumes a few things.

  • That people go to places like coffee shops because they want to talk and meet other people and not, for example, enjoy a pleasant cup of steaming brew while musing, daydreaming, or thinking deeply in a place designed for relaxing imbibition.
  • That when folks are on their computers, they’re not socializing.
  • That there is something wrong with sitting silently but comfortably in a group of similarly-engaged companions if that activity involves one’s laptop (quiet study groups, or people reading books, appear to be above criticism).
  • That it is better to talk to the people around you than to be silent and engrossed in an activity.
  • That choosing one’s computer over contact with strangers is bad.
  • That one should reasonably expect a coffee shop to be a lively and social place.
  • That working on a laptop excludes the possibility of conversation, with friends or with strangers.

I think that most folks who have worked on laptops in coffee shops for any period of time would know most, if not all, of these assumptions aren’t true. The coffee shops that I have known and loved best, the ones with the strongest community, are those that allow people to comfortably do whatever it is they’d like to do at that coffee shop.

May 3rd, 2009